- Index hide
Film tax incentives generally come in the form of tax credits equal to a percentage of qualified state spending on a film or television production and/or sales tax exemptions on qualified transactions.
In 2021, with the economy in full recovery, at least 10 states enacted measures to implement or expand film tax incentives.
The movie of “Batgirl” previously announced starring the actor from “In the Heights”; Leslie Grace, Michael Keaton and Brendan Fraser will not be released at all, Warner Bros Discovery has unexpectedly announced, despite the fact that filming has already been completed and the film is in post-production.
Directed by the directors of Ms Marvel, Adil El Arbi and Bilall Fallahthe film was initially greenlit in 2021 as part of a larger move at Warner Bros to create feature films specifically for the streaming service. HBOMax. But the studio confirmed Tuesday that the film will not be released, either in theaters or in HBOMax.
The reason? taxes
The film tax incentives they generally come in the form of tax credits equal to a percentage of qualified state spending on a motion picture or television production and/or sales tax exemptions on qualified transactions. Credits are usually refundable or transferable.
In 2021, with the economy in full recovery, at least 10 states enacted measures to implement or expand film tax incentives. By 2022, at least five have: Indiana created the state’s first movie tax credit program. Illinois expanded its existing credit program by raising the cap on resident and qualified nonresident wages to $500,000, from $100,000 for resident wages only. The state of Washington increased the amount of film tax credits that could be awarded annually from $3.5 million to $15 million. After a failed attempt to revive film incentives in 2017, West Virginia reinstated an incentive program with no limit on the number of credits that can be awarded annually.
Legislation passed in New Jersey increased the annual limitation on tax creditss for the production of digital media content from $10 million to $30 million and increased the percentage of qualified expenses that can be claimed.
In this sense, after the battle against COVID-19, current productions seek to expand tax incentives and not reduce them.
In this sense, The Hollywood Reporter said the budget “Batgirl” was a factor in the decision, having risen to nearly $90 million due to costs related to filming during the Covid-19 pandemic. While the budget is lower than the average for DC superhero movies, it was reportedly decided that it didn’t have the “spectacle that audiences have come to expect from DC movies” and that it would not recoup its losses upon release.
Furthermore, according to Variety “Batgirl” was made under a different regimen at Warner Bros, headed by Jason Kilar and Ann Sarnoff, which was singularly focused on building its streaming service, hbo max. That effort included Kilar’s infamous decision to release the studio’s entire theatrical slate for 2021 simultaneously on the streamer, which helped build the subscriber base but also jeopardized the studio’s reputation with top-tier talent (although many agents and stars privately came to appreciate the move when the company paid generous bonuses as compensation).
Even before David Zaslav took over the reins of the newly formed Warner Bros As CEO this spring, the executive went on a highly publicized listening tour designed to repair the company’s relationship with the creative community. As part of that effort, Zaslav has made no secret that he reversed Kilar’s strategy and committed to releasing feature films in theaters before putting them on HBO Max.
“Batgirl” found itself on the downside of that decision, apparently neither big enough to feel worthy of a big theatrical release nor small enough to make economic sense in an increasingly cutthroat streaming landscape.
release the movie on hbo max would seem to be the most obvious solution. Instead, the company has dropped “Batgirl”With “scooby!” sequel, and multiple sources say it will almost certainly require a tax cut on both films, viewed internally as the most financially sound way to recover costs (at least, on the ledger).
This could be justified by the change in strategy after the merger.
Doing so, however, would mean Warner Bros can’t monetize either movie: there’s no debut on HBO Max and no sale to another studio.
A case similar to this was “Halo”of Neill Blomkamp and although the fans have not yet given up hope of seeing the Master Chief on the big screen, the video game already had its big break in 2005. With Peter Jackson in production and Neill Blomkamp director, executives backed out after five months of pre-production, and taxes are said to be the reason. Spielberg it’s trying as a TV series, but it also doesn’t seem like they’ll stop delaying it every time a new deadline is reached.
Which brings potentially significant tax implications to the table, and a detailed understanding of the full range of tax implications can be just as essential as the actual financing of a film project.