Through his Twitter account, Cano pointed out that the charge for this degree modality is unconstitutional, since it goes against the General Law of Higher Education issued in 2019.
“Is the collection of graduates unconstitutional as an option for a degree at UNAM and therefore susceptible to indirect? I say yes after the educational reform of 2019, where the right to higher education is maximized ”, she published.
It was through this social network that Cano announced that the amparo claim was admitted.
“Sue the UNAM for the unconstitutional charge of the degree graduates, does not make me less of a university student, in its corridors and classrooms I learned to be critical and I knew the love for Human Rights, I will be a faithful defender of its autonomy, but that autonomy is not extraterritoriality,” he said.
Well, a Collegiate Court agreed with me, the nature of the acts claimed does not automatically condition the refusal of provisional suspensions in amparo proceedings.
Yes, omissions-negatuvos acts can be suspended (restoratively) pic.twitter.com/IUt1z0fvQi
– Abraham Cano (@Abrahamcd14)
March 7, 2023