In the face of the “temporary” suspension, concerns really arise, where the background is not clear, but between the lines and acts the fact that the platform provided an enormous amount of information is revealed, which became an obstacle for the current administration . With the suspension, it will only be possible to obfuscate the information and that there are many direct processes of purchase with public funds, which could not be reported, benefiting the close circle of the presidential family and their friends.
There is no technical opinion issued with clarity and depth of the failures and mechanisms to be implemented during the suspension of CompraNet, which leaves more doubts. The simple justification of “technical failures” is very ambiguous and personally I affirm that there has not been a major cyberattack whose precedence left notorious effects.
Let us remember months ago the blows to the INAI as a result of the tantrums made in the morning talks, without a doubt the precedent was clear that transparency hinders the personal interests of some political figures. The issue of CompraNet with a bad pretext and without clear justification is not surprising.
Thousands of contracts these days have been directly affected and the alternatives of continuing the process physically will lead us to a clear setback, inefficiency and slow operation.
A couple of questions arise: how does the government spend the money? And who will you buy from? All that remains for us is to be observers of the (again) actions against transparency to benefit those close to us and demand at least our right to information and inherent clarity.