On the other hand, both companies have manipulated the accounting presentation of their liabilities, by using unreliable criteria to reveal the debts they have with suppliers and contractors, also giving an inaccurate presentation to the problem of pensions to be covered.
Projects and works, by dint of precipitating inaugurations, are carried out with great opacity, reaching the extreme of putting at risk the quality, compatibility and durability of the equipment, materials and technologies used, which, far from representing savings, has meaning huge ‘escalations’ in prices.
Unfortunately, haste establishes priorities in what should be long-term models, irresponsibly acquiring what is available over what is adequate, accepting, of course, the prices imposed by those who meet capricious dates.
Maintenance has been relegated, generating false economies that will result in new purchases and not in minor repairs or replacement of spare parts and consumables, favoring an undesirable profile in the operation of the state industry, leading it to a course of constant failure in the medium term since eventual obsolescence. Scenario that will represent loads, simultaneous and accumulated, in a period not exceeding five years.
The emergence of events caused by the disintegration or demolition of service and production chains, caused by non-payment to the national supply line, both in Pemex and in CFE, as well as the inevitable occurrence of events involving the urgent replacement of equipment, machinery and correction in operating facilities, will force the financial authorities to resort to the international debt markets in a stormy and disorganized manner, without the capacity to establish and design schedules in accordance with the government’s fundraising.
The needs in the health, education, infrastructure and other branches of the federal public administration have not disappeared, they have only been postponed, subordinating the public treasury to three large projects tlatoanics, that voraciously consume budgetary resources, in an environment of predicted recession, which will necessarily impact tax revenues.
That is, the Federal Executive does not follow any planning or programming, but only establishes, on an overwhelming short-term basis, the channeling of increasingly scarce resources, subjecting itself more to an ideological teleology than to a functional vision of the apparatus. bureaucratic, impacting with its decisions the supply chains associated with it; leading to a catastrophic scenario to companies that are highly demanding of material and human resources in the country, yes, to an outstanding segment of the national productive apparatus.
In a sea magnum of disputes and controversies of a political nature, it has ceased to be perceived that a huge hole has been dug in the projection and forecasting of public spending, separating it from the most elementary planning of official indebtedness, which, far from annulling the need for loans , will deepen it, making it critical in the medium term.
On balance, not only will there be no savings or benefits, but the model of reckless deferral of official indebtedness will cause an imbalance in public finances such as has not been faced in decades. The political profitability of containing the financing of the government sector is inversely proportional to the devastation that it will cause in the satisfaction of the needs of the population, intensifying in the incoming administration, generating an inertial ballast in several more.