However, despite the fact that a woman heads the Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare, the effort to build a legal-labor scaffolding that provides effective equality of access to opportunities is practically nil. Not only because behind the head of that branch are powerful interests that go beyond her, but because she represents an electoral force that does not give priority to the agenda of the movement that, among other fronts, attends to the occupational vicissitudes of millions of Mexican women. .
The Federal Executive still thinks that it complies by filling bureaucratic spaces with a very limited number of women who, although it is true, enjoy great weight in the collegiate bodies they make up, in reality they are part of a well-calculated scheme to build a trivial narrative, a that they think will gather the electoral support of the genre, when in reality, it is only a matter of a few dozen unconditional ones to whom the gaze has been turned.
The official party is wrong, it is a gender movement and not the anointing of representatives by way. It’s good that there are more spaces and more weight, but it’s bad that it’s done just for show and not to create an environment of equal opportunities for millions of people who have not been able to achieve equality. The appointments made speak for themselves, making it clear that the commitment of the nominees is clearly in favor of an electoral option and not in favor of proposals that make a difference. Much has been said, but little progress has been made.
As happened in the United States and England almost two centuries ago, an organized, structured movement with clear leadership is needed more than the accommodative response of a government that hardly looks at the discontent of a growing movement that has run into fences. of indifference and with contempt blows. The expression of the palace resident is more than revealing. The filling of spaces that he himself discredits, could not be more eloquent. He seeks votes, not gender parity.