The iPhone 13 and iPhone 13 Pro are already official, the new high-end from Apple. For the first time in the history of the company, Pro models mount a processor with differences. In this case, the iPhone 13 Pro (and Pro Max) have a GPU with an extra core. Also, as is common in some generations, the Pro models have more RAM.
We are going to show you the first results seen in Geekbench, as we have seen in Applesfera, since the results show important differences between the GPU of the iPhone 13 Pro and the iPhone 13. According to these data, which still have to be taken with caution, if we want maximum power, we will have to bet on the Pro models.
The iPhone 13 Pro, up to 40% faster in GPU than the iPhone 13
The first Geekbench tests of the iPhone 13 Pro compared to the iPhone 13 show significant differences in GPU performance. Specifically, these are the GPU data that they show from the test.
- iPhone 13 Pro (iPhone 13 Pro Max): 14,216.
- iPhone 12 Pro: 9,123.
First, there is a significant improvement over the previous generation, specifically, about 55% more than the iPhone 12. However, the striking fact is the difference between the iPhone 13 Pro and the iPhone 13.
- iPhone 13 Pro (iPhone 13 Pro Max): 14,216.
- iPhone 13 (iPhone 13 mini): 10.608.
We are talking about about 4,000 points of difference between one phone and another, a difference that can be due to several factors. First of all, the GPU of the Pro models has five cores, instead of the four cores of the iPhone 13. Apple does not provide data, but there may also be differences in the clock frequency of these GPUs.
In addition to these interesting GPU data, the Geekbench tests show a spectacular result in CPU. Specifically, the iPhone 13 reaches 1,728 points in single-core and 4,695 in multi-core. These figures far exceed those of any other Android with Snapdragon 888.
- iPhone 13 single-core: 1,728.
- iPhone 13 multi-core: 4,695.
- iPhone 12 single-core: 1,598
- iPhone 12 multi-core: 4,176.
As always, we will have to wait to be able to do our own tests and verify this data. Nevertheless, A15 results point high, despite the fact that the improvement over the previous generation was not expected so noticeable.