On fifth day, February 29, 2024, Elon Musk, co-founder of OpenAI, entered into an action against a non-profit organization dedicated to the development of Artificial Intelligence. It does not document, at the institution, its CEO Sam Altman and even ChatGPT are accused of violating its founding agreement.
The essence, the original objective of OpenAI was to become an organization dedicated to research and development for the advancement of the sector in a general way.
But according to Elon, it has now become a “de facto subsidiary” of Microsoft, representing a “serious threat to humanity” with its development. Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).
During the day, the organization maintained a stony silence on the matter, but now, in response, top executives of OpenAI have circulated internal memos to its officials refuting point by point Musk’s claims.
Com isso, a new chapter is opened in this fight that seems to be an inevitable defect that will lead to the tribunes.
OpenAI’s internal memoranda respond to Elon Musk’s judicial action
According to how it relates to CNBCor CEO of OpenAI, Sam Altman, express in your memorandum the deep disappointment felt by the change in attitude of Elon Musk, whom he considered a hero. Altman warns officials that Musk’s attacks will continue in the future.
In turn, OpenAI’s strategy director, Jason Kwon, focuses on refuting the three main accusations of the judicial action. In relation to the experience of AGI, Kwon argues that GPT-4, the most recent creation of OpenAI, is long enough to be an AGI, defining this type of intelligence as a “highly autonomous system capable of devising innovative solutions to long-standing challenges.” “.
Kwon denies that OpenAI has abandoned its mission to benefit humanity, highlighting the availability of its APIs and products as proven.
Finally, Kwon clarifies the relationship with Microsoft, stating that the company does not have control over the research, development or direction of OpenAI, and that it is compatible with the AI tools market.
Internal memos also suggest that Musk’s lawsuit may be motivated by “regret” for distancing himself from OpenAI.
However, it is certain that demand arises at a crucial moment for a company, which is an unnecessary process of transition from a non-profit organization to a company with profit goals.
Therefore, the most obvious conclusion as you see is that there is a very high possibility that Elon Musk may seek to renegotiate his participation in the company or even assume or control it at some point in the future.