On March 7, a panel of judges heard oral arguments in Grayscale Investments’ lawsuit against the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Grayscale is challenging the SEC’s order not to approve Grayscale’s request to create a spot Bitcoin (BTC) exchange-traded fund (ETF). The SEC issued its order on July 6, 2022.
Former Attorney General Donald Verrilli Jr. represented Grayscale and SEC Senior Counsel Emily Parise spoke on behalf of the SEC before Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan and Judges Neomi Rao and Harry Edwards in the Court of Appeals for the District Circuit of Columbia. Verrilli began by saying:
“The fundamental problem with the order is that it contradicts previous SEC orders greenlighting Bitcoin futures ETPs that pose the same fraud and manipulation risk and have the same CME surveillance mechanism in place. [Chicago Mercantile Exchange] to guard against those risks.”
The SEC has approved investment products from Teucrium, ProShares, VanEck and Valkyrie linked to BTC futures.
Parise argued that the offerings are not comparable to Grayscale’s proposal because the oversight mechanisms are not identical, as the spot markets underlying the asset in the proposed ETF are “fragmented and unregulated,” unlike the CME, which is regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
Parise also rejected the argument that the spot and Bitcoin futures markets move together 99.9% of the time, noting that it is unclear whether the futures market leads the spot market when affected by fraud and manipulation. , or vice versa.
For the proposed Grayscale product, CME surveillance would serve as a substitute for spot market surveillance. In addition, the 99.9% correlation is based on “once a day” futures prices, regardless of intraday prices, Parise added.
INTERESTING: So the SEC lawyer came out strong w opening argument blah blah, but the judge interrupted her SEVERAL TIMES with a bunch of very educated q’s re futures and spot relationship, Teucrium filing etc. SEC seems a bit rattled by this the pro-Grayscale-y judge and her de ella q’s de ella. pic.twitter.com/suyMkgPRcF
—Eric Balchunas (@EricBalchunas) March 7, 2023
The judges directed more questions at Parise than at Verrilli, leading crypto-community commentators to interpret his leanings as pro-Grayscale. They asked for clarification, for example, about how Teucrium’s product that received SEC approval differs from Grayscale’s, and why the spot and futures markets might be affected differently by fraud and manipulation.
Clarification: The information and/or opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views or editorial line of Cointelegraph. The information presented here should not be taken as financial advice or investment recommendation. All investment and commercial movement involve risks and it is the responsibility of each person to do their due research before making an investment decision.
Investments in crypto assets are not regulated. They may not be suitable for retail investors and the entire amount invested may be lost. The services or products offered are not directed or accessible to investors in Spain.