• Adidas
  • Adobe
  • AliExpress
  • Amazon
  • AMD
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Batman
  • Bitcoin
  • ChatGPT
  • Chocolate
  • CorelDRAW
  • Cyberpunk
  • Disney
  • Elden Ring
  • Entertainment
  • Exercises
  • Facebook
  • Gaming
  • Google
  • HBO
  • Health
  • Hogwarts Legacy
  • How to
  • How to grow your children
  • Huawei
  • Instagram
  • Internet
  • iOS
  • iPhone
  • Lamborghini
  • Lenovo
  • Linux
  • Marijuana
  • Marvel Cinematic Universe
  • Mediatek
  • Mercedes
  • Metaverse
  • Mexico
  • Microsoft
  • MIUI
  • Motorola
  • Movies
  • Movistar
  • Naruto
  • Netflix
  • NFT
  • Nintendo
  • Nissan
  • OnePlus
  • Photoshop
  • PlayStation
  • Pokemon
  • Pregnancy
  • PUBG
  • Redmi
  • Russia
  • Samsung
  • Series
  • Smart Home
  • Smartwatch
  • Sony
  • Space
  • Technology
  • Terms And Conditions
  • TikTok
  • Toyota
  • Trailer
  • Twitter
  • Uber
  • Uncharted
  • Volkswagen
  • Walmart
  • WhatsApp
  • Wi-Fi
  • Will Smith
  • WordPress
  • Write for us
  • Xbox
  • YouTube
  • Windows
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Bullfrag Bullfrag
Subscribe
  • Entertainment
    • Fashion
    • Lifestyle
      • Home Decor
  • Gaming
  • Health
  • News
    • Business
      • Marketing
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Sports
  • Recipes
  • Technology
    • Science
    • Automobiles
    • Internet
    • Software
Bullfrag Bullfrag
Home»News»Cryptocurrency»Investors Could Have Avoided What Happened To FTX If The SEC Had Tackled Bitcoin ETFs, Says BitGo CEO

Investors Could Have Avoided What Happened To FTX If The SEC Had Tackled Bitcoin ETFs, Says BitGo CEO

MatthewBy MatthewMarch 10, 2023No Comments4 Mins Read
Investors Could Have Avoided What Happened To FTX If The SEC Had Tackled Bitcoin ETFs, Says BitGo CEO
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

According to Mike Belshe, the US SEC’s reluctance to address a “core” regulatory issue like the issuance of a BTC ETF could have paved the way for FTX’s alleged illicit activities.

The bankruptcy of the FTX cryptocurrency exchange and other bearish developments in the sector were at the center of debates between legislators and witnesses at the inaugural hearing of the Subcommittee on Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Inclusion of the Financial Services Committee of the United States House of Representatives Joined.

Addressing lawmakers at the hearing on March 9, BitGo co-founder and CEO Mike Belshe criticized the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, for enforcement actions against crypto companies that “try to get it right,” that is, communicate with regulators and find a way to operate in the country. He cited the experience of BitGo going through the process of approaching the SEC in 2018 seeking a regulatory path forward on the question of how the firm should hold assets, only to wait over 4 years for a definitive answer.

According to Belshe, the SEC’s reluctance to address a “core” regulatory issue like the issuance of an exchange-traded Bitcoin (BTC) fund could have seemingly opened the door for bad actors like Sam Bankman-Fried to operate FTX as it did. . The former CEO faces charges from the SEC, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and federal prosecutors related to the transfer of user funds between the exchange and Alameda Research.

“One has to wonder if we couldn’t have prevented the huge amounts of money flowing into FTX if the basic principle of a Bitcoin ETF had been provided and approved by the SEC,” Belshe said. “There were more than 25 valid applications, some from Invesco and other big-name companies that have made ETFs for many years in the past.”

Investors Could Have Avoided What Happened To FTX If The SEC Had Tackled Bitcoin ETFs, Says BitGo CEO
Mike Belshe, co-founder and CEO of BitGo, before the Subcommittee on Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Inclusion on March 9.

Much of the discussion between lawmakers and industry experts at the hearing centered on which federal agencies might regulate certain crypto assets if legislation were passed by Congress. Some House Republicans appeared to be particularly critical of the Biden administration’s approach to crypto assets, as evidenced by the hearing headline, which called their actions an “attack on the digital asset ecosystem.”

Read:  The Fintech ecosystem is growing in Latin America, according to a VISA study

“This report outlines President Biden’s political plan to lawlessly abuse administrative status to push US crypto companies and their US clients into offshore, unregulated, opaque and insecure markets,” Rep. Tom Emmer said, citing a report. of January 27 from the White House on mitigating the risks associated with cryptocurrencies. “This administration is arming the banking industry to debank legal crypto activity here in the United States, using scare tactics to drive an entire industry out of the country.”

#HappeningNow: Chairman @RepFrenchHill convenes the Subcommittee on Digital Assets, Financial Technology & Inclusion for a hearing on the Biden Administration’s attack on the digital asset ecosystem.

Tune In https://t.co/FGQaA37IYN pic.twitter.com/DqBA6O5rcc

— Financial Services GOP (@FinancialCmte) March 9, 2023

Other witnesses in the hearing were more critical of cryptocurrencies as a whole rather than focusing on a single agency, political party, or presidential administration. Rep. Brad Sherman, a well-known critic of the space, referred to crypto as a “scourge” on the economic system. Lee Reiners, policy director at the Duke Financial Economics Center, claimed that while FTX was a “bad apple,” the entire cryptocurrency industry was “rotten.”

“Cryptocurrencies and their unique nature was what fueled the rise of FTX, and is what brought FTX crashing down in the blink of an eye,” Reiners stated.

The House subcommittee hearing was the first in the new session of Congress to address issues related to the cryptocurrency market and the FTX collapse since December 2022. Lawmakers on the Senate Banking Committee held their own hearing exploring the impact of the “crypto crash” in February.

Clarification: The information and/or opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views or editorial line of Cointelegraph. The information presented here should not be taken as financial advice or investment recommendation. All investment and commercial movement involve risks and it is the responsibility of each person to do their due research before making an investment decision.

Related Posts

Do algorithmic stablecoins have a future in the face of scrutiny from centralized stablecoins?

April 2, 2023

Uniswap v3 code is free to fork on BSL expiration

April 2, 2023

Former Activision Blizzard Exec Joins Yuga Labs As New CEO

April 1, 2023
Add A Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Chivas vs. Atlas (3-3): video, summary and goals of the vibrant match of Liga MX 2023

April 2, 2023

Brands and advertising with AI

April 2, 2023

Broadcast channels watch Australian GP 2023 TODAY Sunday April 2 F1 race

April 2, 2023

Results Wrestlemania 39 LIVE Day 1: summary and the best of the WWE event

April 2, 2023
Facebook Twitter Instagram
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Write for us
© 2023 Bullfrag. Designed by Bullfrag.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.