- Index hide
A viper attacked a minor when it was placed on the girl’s neck, causing the snake to attack.
After the incident, the minor was rushed to a hospital to be treated for the snake’s bite.
The practice of living with wild animals as if they were pets has been a very negative practice for many years in which this practice has been carried out.
A terrible practice of using wild animals as an attraction has become the worst precedent for a Russian zoo, after a snake that was being used for this purpose, was placed on the neck of a girl and the consequences of the act led the minor to end up in the hospital.
The enclosures have resorted to activations of this type on many occasions, where respect for the wild environment in which these types of animals must be kept is violated.
Faced with these prevailing bad practices, groups of animals have spoken out with all kinds of actions and in publicity these have not been in vain, on the contrary, they achieve all kinds of reactions against animal abuse.
A controversial bite
A girl visiting the Butterflies Park Cuddly Pet Zoo was bitten by a snake and the fact has become the worst image for this place.
Viktoria is the name of the minor attacked by the reptile, when she was wrapped around the minor’s neck.
The events recorded led staff members to realize that the animal was a poisonous one, coming from East Africa, for which the minor was transferred to emergency treatment for a snake bite.
As can be seen in the witnesses to the attack, the minor has the snake curled around her neck when it attacks her face, causing surprise in the citizens, who assured that the reaction was unexpected, since it had never done it before.
What is an important factor to take into account is that it is a wild species and abuse in these types of presentations where it has permanent human contact is a practice that must disappear, to avoid a bad reputation in enclosures that continue to explode with species in captivity.
Enclosures and their controversial practices
The appalling management of wild species has been the reason for various campaigns and content that have managed to generate controversy both for the way these animals are attacked and for the content that is recorded in order to live experiences close to these animals.
In the tourist environment it has become a common practice to go to gorilla habitats and witness the last species that are presumed to exist on the planet. Other cases that we have been able to witness remind us of the complaints against brands such as Louis Vuitton for sourcing skins produced on farms where the killing of crocodiles has become very cruel, generating all kinds of responses in this regard.
Where is the consumer’s decision?
Although this long list of options continues to exist where profiting from animals has become common, an element that we cannot lose sight of in this exercise is that which has to do with the consumer and their decision to consume this content.
There is no doubt that today more than ever it is necessary to strengthen a culture with greater awareness of animal rights and, more importantly, understand the value in consumption when betting on practices where these species are no longer abused.
–
Now read: